Friday, June 12, 2009

Antisemitism and Arrogance

Wednesday's shooting at the Holocaust Museum in Washington D.C. was a tragedy, but to see in it only the shameful face of antisemitism is to have selective vision. Though James von Brunn targeted a Jewish institution, he likely planned for the consequence of encountering a security guard. He knew he wasn't going to get to shoot a Jew. He knew this because he had an understanding (albeit a twisted one) of the relationship between race and social status, and despite his other inaccuracies and fringe-element tendencies, he got one thing right. Unless it's Israel, Jews don't work security.

The Washington Post came close to the mark today, the second full day of von Brunn's fifteen minutes of infamy: "They're often derided as rent-a-cops, the hall monitors of law enforcement, whose uniforms suggest professionalism and proficiency even if they don't always garner respect." Special Police Officer Stephen T. Johns certainly didn't fit this description, and the justified horror at his death - along with his instant canonization by a media in desperate need of heroes - indicates that this derision is far from the minds of the public. But derision and worship are two sides of the same coin, easily flipped. How long ago were the white-collar museum employees thumbing their noses at Officer Johns, or perhaps casually giving a fist bump as they passed through the metal detectors, only to reveal their true feelings with an inappropriate utterance, a "yo" or a "bro" thrown in for good measure?

I ask because my own experience working at New York City's Museum of Jewish Heritage: A Living Memorial to the Holocaust taught me that the blatant Jim Crow racism of our parent's generation has been replaced by the soft feudalism of an economically and racially determined caste system. The division between those in the office and those in the lobby was as clear as the Museum's plate-glass doors, and contemplated just as much. Which is to say not very much at all, at least not on the office side of things. As one of the few Jews working on the museum's first floor, I like to think I reflected a better part of our heritage - we were some of the first Freedom Riders, after all, and the Jewish ideal of tikkun olam is often rightly interpreted as a call to heal the wounds of racial division.

There is another part of our heritage, though, that is at odds with the pluralistic society in which we live. It is exceptionalism, the belief that we are the chosen few, and it finds expression in the arrogance of those on the museum's top floor, their unquestioning belief that they belong there, and that those on the bottom, well, they belong there too.

D.C.'s Holocaust Museum is well-funded, and this incident is sure to guarantee the jobs of its security staff for years to come. New York's museum is not quite so lucky. Poorly managed finances and inadequate leadership (whose arrogance is just an element of their general decline from respectable academics to self-righteous egotists) means that reductions in staff are inevitable. In fact, New York's museum has cut approximately ten percent of its staff in the last year. The first cuts, of course, were made in the security and cleaning staffs. Whether from downsizing or violence, in American Jewish institutions, the first victims are sure to be minorities.

Antisemitism certainly still exists, but if that's the main lesson we've learned from von Brunn's hideous acts, then we're missing the point. The Post quotes FBI agent Todd Blodgett as saying "Von Brunn is obsessed with Jewish people... he had equal contempt for both Jews and blacks, but if he had to pick one group to wipe out, he'd always say it would be the Jews." Von Brunn based this obsession on his belief that Jews were exceptionally powerful and therefore deserving of an exceptional hatred. If we continue to set ourselves apart, we simply give fodder to men like Von Brunn. Instead we should acknowledge, as Jews before us have, that nobody is safe until we are all safe.

And we should stop thinking that Officer Johns died for us. He died because a crazy man was full of hate, and despite our dissections and categorizations, hate remains a singular force. Dividing von Brunn's into anti-semitism and white supremacy, like dividing the world into Jew and Gentile, only reinforces our own arrogance. If we insist on standing apart, we will be alone when we fall.

Thursday, February 08, 2007

The L Loves Cool Literature

http://www.thelmagazine.com/index.cfm?listings_id=111932

from the site:

Literary Upstart 2007 Is Coming! Literary Upstart 2007 Is Coming!
Ladies and gentlemen, writers and lushes, lend us your ears: The L Magazine is proud to announce our third annual Literary Upstart: The Search for Pocket Fiction competition. For those of you unfamiliar with the deal: you send your short stories; we read them; we invite four or five submitters to read at one of our three booze-soaked semifinal readings, in front of a panel of judges (consisting of editors, agents, and other literary types), who will hold forth, American Idol-style, on the stories, and announce a winner, whose story will be published in the L's annual Summer Fiction Issue, and who will return for the final reading to compete for a Cash Prize with the other semi-final winners. I should also mention, in the interests of full disclosure, that the events are hella fun to attend, and usually involve various L Mag staffers getting drunk at yelling at the emcee to "take off [his] shirt!"

This year's panel of judges includes the New Yorker's Ben Greeman; last year's Literary Upstart winner (and current Gawker columnist/pin-up) Gabriel Delahaye; Random House/Doubleday's Christine Pride; the Curtis Brown Agency, LTD's Katherine Fausset; and the L's very own Adam Bonislawski. The first reading will be held March 29 April 12, so get cracking.

And now, here it is, our Call for Submissions:
Stories (please limit yourself to two submissions) should be 1,500 words or fewer, and previously unpublished. Style and content are at your discretion.
Please send your stories as Word attachments, in a standard 12-point font, to fiction@thelmagazine.com. You may also mail them (please include your email address) to:

Fiction Editor
The L Magazine
20 Jay Street, Ste. 207
Brooklyn, NY 11201
Since the live event is such a big part of the competition, please don't submit stories unless you can arrange to be in the NYC area for a reading or two between March and June.
Happy writing, everyone.

Tuesday, January 09, 2007

Facebook Goes to Washington

“we will be creating profiles for all sitting U.S. Representatives, Senators and state governors. Any politician who wants to maintain an ongoing relationship with their younger constituents will be able to on Facebook.” – From Ezra on the Facebook blog

Somehow I just can’t see Nancy Pelosi on Facebook.

Will the politico’s mini-feed cover votes? If they are our friends, will our mini-feeds cover their votes? Most importantly, will they post scandalous pictures of beerpong and drug use?

Exciting times ahead…

Thursday, January 04, 2007

Second Avenue Deli Redux

http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2007/01/04/2nd_avenue_deli_2.php

The Second Avenue Deli is (possibly) reborn!

Well, that exclamation point is a bit forced. I never went there. I passed by years ago, unaware of the hooplah, and only realized what the big deal was recently. Then it closed. Too bad, I never got the chance to pay fifteen dollars for a corned beef and tongue sandwhich.

Anyway, a Brooklyn location might lower the prices and the tourist vibe. And, generally speaking, I have a pro-deli policy, so maybe the city will get lucky on this one.

Thursday, December 21, 2006

Warsaw de Deus

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6200539.stm

"Polish MPs bid to make Jesus king

A group of Polish members of parliament have submitted a bill seeking to proclaim Jesus Christ king of their overwhelmingly Catholic country.
Forty-six deputies - 10% of the lower house - signed the bill, which was tabled earlier this week, reports say.

Some Polish clerics however have criticised the move as unnecessary.

If the bill becomes law, Jesus will follow the path of the Virgin Mary, who was declared honorary queen of Poland by King John Casimir 350 years ago.

The motion has been backed by MPs from the far right League of Polish families (LPR), the conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party and the Peasants' Party (PSL).

They argued Jesus should be made king on both theological and historical grounds.

PiS deputy Artur Gorski said colleagues were "praying in the parliamentary chapel for [Jesus'] coronation", Reuters news agency reported.

But Monsignor Tadeusz Pieronek, a member of Poland's episcopate and rector at Krakow's Papal Academy of Theology, dismissed the move.

"Christ doesn't need a parliamentary resolution to be the king of our hearts," AFP news agency quoted him as saying.

"These lawmakers would do better to look after their constitutional prerogatives and let religious institutions and the Church do our work," he said."

In other news, there's a guy behind me talking really loudly on his cellphone to someone named Laurence. Strange. But the mofo is stopping me from coming up with something funny to say about the Polish-Jesus-King story. I mean, c'mon...

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

NYC 2030: City of Gloss

I usually throw out the glossy pages hiding between the folds of my New York Times – especially when, like today, they fall on the grimy floor of the L train – but I found these particular pages of interest. Ten of them, glossy as previously mentioned, filled with photographs, regular graphs, and witty captions about Plan NYC’s plan (or lack thereof) for the next twenty-five years. Factoids, too – did you know that a third of New Yorkers pay more than half of their income towards rent? Or that two million New Yorkers live more than ten minutes from a park? Or that together we can create a sustainable city? Alright, the last one isn’t a factoid, but it is in the report, and it does sound nice.

The insert – which I saw on the ground again later in the day, this time on Jay Street, glossy pages too heavy to flap in the Dumbo wind – is heavy on the statistics and heavy on the idealism, asking (and answering): “By 2030, will you still love New York? It’s up to you.” And just so we take things seriously, page three features the following admonition: “We should be proud. But we should not become complacent.” The insert continues: “Previous generations looked ahead… now it is our turn.” So, one asks, what is the modern equivalent of the forward-looking thinking behind Central Park, the subway, and the water tunnels? And must it involve glossy inserts?

Well, the Mayor’s Sustainability Advisory Board will tell you, first you’ve got to get a handle on the problem. To provide this handle, they list the “top three things you should know about New York over the next 25 years,” a list I actually like (in an intellectual way – the reality of the situation is depressing): First, one million new New Yorkers; second, aging infrastructure – subway signals from the ‘40s, water tunnels from the ‘30s, energy grid from the ‘20s; third, pollution. The urbanophile in me is tickled pink, but the flaneur is a sickly green from imagining hoards of dirty people on deteriorating trains drinking contaminated water. Something must be done.

Unfortunately, for all the worthy goals in the insert’s conclusion, the particulars are lacking. Not that such an insert needs to be a call to action, but its silence on specific projects indicates a timidity, a refusal to engage in the brick-and-mortar (or, if Frank Gehry has his way, the steel-and-glass) politics of the day. Any “official” document dealing with the future of New York City must either deal with these, or become a historical footnote. Or blog fodder. Or both. (To its credit, Plan NYC’s website attempts to give some specifics, though most are limited to the household.) Pretty pictures notwithstanding, this publication is an invitation to think of urban reality as larger-than-life, or, at least, larger-than-me.

Clearly, I’m a pragmatist. I find this idealistic vision of the city standing in the way of necessary action. It either inspires overly large urban transformations – Atlantic Yards anyone? – or leads to impossibly long delays – the Second Avenue Subway and East Side Access, a LIRR tunnel to Grand Central, have both been on the books for decades and are just receiving necessary funds. The Mayor’s Sustainability Advisory Board is too optimistic – their glasses are half full because the subways are only half full, though they say that, without improvement, the subways will be all full by 2030. Then the advisors’ glasses will be half empty, or all empty, jostled by elbows and winter coats on a downtown 6, because nothing will have happened besides more press conferences, publications, and public hearings. As things stand – which is to say, clutching a pole while trying to do a crossword puzzle with one hand – the City of Dreams needs to wake up and go to work.

Monday, December 11, 2006

Hey Young World

I’ve been linked. In honor, I’ve taken the whole link thing one step further. I’ve distilled this gem (crumb?) from the link after mine in GL’s Monday Brooklinks section, a New York Times article about a suspected murder-suicide:

“It was also unclear how long the four had been dead. A neighbor, Ana Tirado, said Ms. Soto came to her apartment on Dec. 1 with an uncooked chicken, asking that Ms. Tirado prepare it with her own popular recipe, but that Ms. Soto forgot the ingredients for a sauce and left to get them.

“And then she never came back,” Ms. Tirado said. “I got a little worried, but I thought she took the kids to her mother’s.”

Eventually, Ms. Tirado ate the chicken, not wanting it to go to waste, she said.”

The sick thing is, I think Michael Wilson and Ann Farmer – or, more likely, the copy editors and style guiders – thought it was funny when they wrote it.

“Crumbs…” – Slick Rick